The Importance of the 8th Juror throughout the Play "12 Angry Men" by Reginald Rose.

When reading the play 12 angry men, is it intemperate to ignore the prominent character- the 8th Juror. As the plot unfolds, the reader notices that Juror #8 is the only one among the 12 who in truth understands the seriousness of the situation at their hands. At the rattling beginning of the play, you posterior ascertain that there is no kindliness towards the male child impeach of murder. And why should it be? All the designate that was brought up in the court room has crushed the defensive measure and the boys chances on the trial. The criminal prosecution queasye it clear that the boy is guilty. In fact, too clear- The defense was helpless and left many holes in their case. Thats why in the initial vote make by the jurors, everybody votes guilty (against the boy) overlook for #8. And here we see the prototypical importance of #8: because of his valid doubt the jury hadnt shew the boy guilty at the first 10 legal proceeding of their debating, which would e nergize fireed the trial. #8 did not necessarily study the boy was innocent, but he understood that if he embossed his hand at that vote- it would totally end. They will not have a chance to discuss the case, and it will, in his eyes, belittle the measure of human life.

Furthermore, we can see that #8 is a key character in many other parts of the play. later on starting to talk nigh the case, some of the other jurors got mad and seek to convince #8 to vote guilty and end the discussion. Yet, he stayed calm and tried to continue debating in hostility of their efforts to convert him. After realizing that he is standing alone against them, he called fo! r another vote, in which he will not participate... If you indigence to get a expert essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay